Holmes has been tracking Moriarty and his agents for months and is on the brink of snaring them all and delivering them to the dock. Moriarty is the nexus of a highly organized and amazingly secret criminal force and Holmes will consider it the crowning achievement of his career if only he can defeat Moriarty. Moriarty of course is out to thwart Holmes’s plans and is well capable of doing so, for he is, as Holmes admits, the great detective’s intellectual equal.
Characters:
- Sherlock Holmes: The great detective of Victorian England
- Dr. John Watson: Holmes’ great friend, and partner in the investigations of many crimes throughout Victorian, England
- Professor Moriarty: The criminal mastermind of a ring of organized crime in Victorian London. Also the intellectual equal of Holmes
Book Review:
There are some books that I understand why they became the great representation of literature that they did. And there are characters in the world of literature that achieve immortal status due to the magnitude of their depth and the influence they have on so many readers. These characters are immortal because they were created to be. They are characters that readers love across all kinds of nationalities, social classes, and educational levels; simply put — readers are able to identify with them, and they bond with them on some very personal levels. Simply put — these types of characters give something to everyone, and no one comes away without having been influenced by these types of characters, in both large ways and small. Holmes is certainly one of those characters. Written as a bread and butter character — he rose to the status of legendary due to the popularity of the newly established concept of serial writing on the part of Doyle. So much so that when he was killed off once, there was such an outcry that Doyle was forced to bring him back.
But sometimes one encounters characters in literature that are a little more illusive, and it is up to the reader to flesh out, or make judgment calls on exactly how the character develops. This can occur for a number of reasons. Either the character is poorly conceived and written; sometimes they are designed to be illusive as a plot means of creating an element of the story; and sometimes these characters are hard to identify with on the part of the reader. However, sometimes there is a character that becomes bigger than life — but it is uncertain why. This story is a great example of this irony in Professor Moriarty.
Professor Moriarty is a strange character in literature because of the status he has achieved through the merits of another character — namely Sherlock Holmes. Doyle created Holmes to be a legendary detective, with an amazing intellect, and beyond average powers of observation and deduction. In essence he defined the concept of deductive reasoning in the investigation of crime. But when Doyle wanted to turn his writing abilities to something more challenging, and with considerably more substance — he was faced with a dilemma. How to end Sherlock Holmes. This is a corner that of course was his own creation, and that he back himself into. In creating the Holmes character, he essentially created not only his own bread and butter, but he also created a character that people loved to love! Essentially Holmes, as the main character had developed a fan base, which of course created the quandary of what do you do with the series to effectively end it.
This is the reason that I get frustrated with serials in literature. Like soap operas, and serial television shows — you become so engrossed in the characters that you tend to lose track of any one story line. It is the characters that drive the serials — and the foundation for the success of a serial story exists entirely in the existence of the characters. Thus the crux of the problem the Doyle encountered when he arrived at today’s story. What do you do with Holmes, in order to satisfactorily end the saga?
Since the Holmes stories were not based on a continuous linear story line — but rather on the character himself. It didn’t matter where the reader jumped in and out of the different story lines. So the only solution to ending the Holmes saga was an effective end of the character. There are only so many options to explore in this realm — Holmes could retire (not very likely since he wasn’t that old of a man in the stories, and he wouldn’t very well leave his passion without good reason.), or he could be forcibly removed from the ability to continue on with his work. Hence, how does one kill a master investigator, that has powers of observation beyond the average, and the ability to identify danger even before it exists. (Or at least that is the way he has always been portrayed.) It wouldn’t be very believable to have Holmes suddenly develop a blind spot to some form of danger that could effectively end his career, when his entire reputation is based on solving and eliminating these kinds of problems.
Enter Professor Moriarty. I am sure that when it came to creating a criminal that had the ability to best Sherlock Holmes, or at the very least create a stale mate between the two great minds — it must have been a challenge for introducing him into the story. Especially since the first time that he appeared in all of the Holmes saga was in the first story that was written about him. Yes, he appeared in stories that Doyle was able to create the illusion that they had happened prior to this one. But the fact is — Moriarty, the master criminal that had a mind that could equal that of the great Holmes; the man that was dubbed “the Napoleon of Crime,” by no less than Holmes himself is a character that literally came out of no where. He had never existed before — even though he is portrayed as running a huge, criminal organization. And he had never crossed paths with Holmes before — even though Holmes states that it is his mind that is behind many of the cases that he worked on throughout his career.
Simply put, in this story we are introduced to the one man that can rival Holmes — but his survivability in the realm of fiction is entirely based on his counterpart — Holmes himself. Everything that we come to know about Moriarty is what we learn, essentially through this one story. And yet, here is a character that has become larger than life. I find myself wondering, and asking others frequently — do you think that Doyle intended Professor Moriarty to become such an infamous character, not to mention one of the most loved villains in the literary world?
This is the one question that I always come away from this story with — Did Moriarty become the great literary criminal master mind because of the character created by Doyle? Or was he, as I am inclined to think, a character riding on the laurels of the character of Holmes, himself? These are the challenges presented in this piece. The whole story comes down to this quandary of was Moriarty intended to be a character that could rival Holmes in his development over the years? Or was he just a character that was created for a purpose and then developed into something more?
For more input into this topic, or information on this author, be sure to check out the websites below:
Literature and Crime
Sherlock Holmes
Who are the Most fascinating Fictitious Villains?
Fictional Portrayals of Psychopaths in Literature
When you buy a product (not just books – any product), via one of my links, The Book Worm’s Library earns income from the sale and as always, it’s much appreciated as all affiliate income is used to support the blog by contributing to giveaways, postage, travel, and attending book industry related events. Our affiliates are Amazon.com










, Abe Books










, Barnes and Noble










, and Indie










. We appreciate all those that help to support our blog, and have provided links below for the direct links to this book.
AbeBooks.com
Barnes and Noble
Follow Us!